3) How is science fiction different from fantasy,
according to Le Guin?
The central
message of Le Guin’s comparison between science fiction and fantasy is formed
around the idea of plausibility. Since science fiction is a “branch of realism”
(Le Guin, 2005, para. 3), there is this unspoken principle that the situation or
the landscape where the action of the story is taking place may actually occur
in the (very distant) future. At least, quite a diminutive possibility definitely
not happening within our lifetime. It is this highly unlikely, but not entirely
ludicrous, chance that something like cyborgs and robots having human
characteristics can happen centuries into the future.
I personally really
admire and completely relate to what she wrote about the expectations people
hold when the story is set in the contemporary world due to the demand for solid
facts. Every single detail about the characters within a story, even if it is
fictional, must ring true; for example, if the protagonist is an American boy, but
he speaks in New Zealand slang using words such as ‘munted’ or ‘nek minute/minnit’,
readers or watchers would evidently feel that the content is not authentic. The
language a character uses, the mannerisms, even the culture, must all coincide
with reality. If it is not, as Le Guin has posited, “[it] will be taken as
nonsense” (2005, para. 4). Which is exactly why, she believes, science fiction
usually stays within the realms of the distant future rather than incorporating
the modern world because of the flexibility this time period provides.
Unlike
fantasy which can virtually fall into any era without seeming ridiculous as the
basis of what makes a fictional fantasy piece is already implausible and out of
the ordinary. Attebery (1980) extends upon this train of thought wherein
fantasy showcases a “straightforward treatment of impossible characters” (p.1).
From the use of magic and construction of a wizarding school like that in Le
Guin’s (1993) own novel series, Earthsea, with Ged the young mage, and comparably
in J.K Rowling’s popularised Harry Potter series with the titular protagonist
of the same name. Mythical beasts like dragons and centaurs, and creatures
ranging from goblins to dementors (Rowling,
1999), it is evident that none of these elements
would ever be seen in reality. To summarise, science fiction has a highly unlikely
(though still minuscule possibility in the very distance future) chance it may
happen, whereas fantasy will never be legitimately
real.
References
Attebery, B. (1980). The
Fantasy Tradition in American Literature: From Irving to Le Guin. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Le Guin, U. K. (2005). Plausibility revisited: Wha hoppen and what didn't. Retrieved from http://www.ursulakleguin.com/PlausibilityRevisited.html
Le Guin, U. K. (1993). The
earthsea quartet. London: Puffin.
Rowling, J. K. (1999). Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban. New York: Scholastic.
Thanks Shell, another good post. You have understood the basis of Le Guinn's argument. The example you give using 'kiwi slang' is excellent. Keep working on linking your ideas clearly within your paragraphs. Great
ReplyDelete