- Hills (2004) lists a number of defining characteristics
of cult TV that contain similarities to the defining characteristics of pop
genres (e.g. fantasy, science fiction) discussed earlier in the Pop Genres
paper. Can you identify these and discuss why you think that these
characteristics are repeatedly viewed as underpinning popular genres?
Definition one:
Hills (2004), suggests that cult TV can be defined through
textual analysis. He also suggests that “cult TV cacn be self-consciously designed
by media producers” and adds that cult TV hails from other genres such as
fantasy, horror and science fiction.
Definition two:
Cult TV is able to be defined through analyzing secondary
texts (Hills, 2004).
“secondary texts such as criticism or publicity, work to promote
the circulation of selected meanings of the primary text… Secondary texts play
a significant role in influencing ehich of televisions meanings may be
activated in any one reading” (Fiske, 1991).
Hills (2004) goes on to elaborate on Fiske’s definition by
explaining that newspaper coverage and other journalistic writing such as fan
magazines, that describe certain programs as cults, activate the meanings and
associations of ‘cult’ for audiences by attaching this term to various programs.
Definition three:
Cult TV can be defined by analyzing the practices and
activities of fans (Hills, 2004).
This definition makes us consider what dedicated fans of
cult TV do to show their ‘fandom’. Hills (2004) explains that this definition
provokes a question; ‘what activities do fans of cult TV engage in?’. In
regards to Buffy the Vampire Slayer the
availability of fan magazines, newspaper coverage and fan forums, such as ‘Buffy-Boards’,
allow the ‘cult’ factor to attach itself to the program.
Why do you think these characteristics are viewed as
underpinning popular genres?
Personally, I think that in order to become a popular genre
something has to have likability, a large audience and something that captures
the audience’s attention. Shows such as Buffy
the Vampire Slayer are able to achieve this due to being able to achieve
those factors.
People are very fascinated, and almost obsessed, with
fictional worlds/things that are unknown to humans. As time goes on, story
lines are becoming more and more creative and extravagant. Whether it be
supernatural horror or conspiracy theory based science fiction – people are
always on the hunt for the next movie, TV series or book to challenge their
imagination. Popular genres such as science fiction and fantasy are able to do
this, often by posing the question ‘what if?’
One of the most important things, though, is relatability.
In a lot of popular genres, such as science fiction and fantasy, we aren’t able
to relate to the world in which the characters live. We are, however, able to
relate or identify with some aspect of the story. In Buffy the Vampire Slayer the character of Buffy is a fairly
universal character, allowing her to be an easy character to relate to. Same
goes for other major characters such as Willow. I believe this is an important
aspect to the reason that the TV series has such a big following. The audience
is able to relate, and engage, with the characters even though they have never
experienced the world of vampires. This relatability inspires the audience to
follow Buffy through her journey as tey now have a sense of attachment to the
character. This exact idea of relatability flows through all popular genres, as
in order to become a popular genre it needs to have a large audience/following.
References:
Hills, M. (2004). Defining Cult TV; Texts,
Inter-texts and Fan Audiences, The
Television Studies Reader, in R. C. Allen & A. Hill. London and New York:
Routledge.
Television Studies Reader, in R. C. Allen & A. Hill. London and New York:
Routledge.
Thanks Emelia. Indeed, relatability is a good term for defining the element of fan-attraction and how it links the ordinary with the extraordinary.
ReplyDelete