‘Cathy
Come Home’ was first shown on the BBC in November 1966. By June the following
year the Beatles song writing team of Lennon and McCartney had released “She’s
Leaving Home”. Clearly this was a time of social awareness, and a time when the
British public, alerted by the media, felt they could and should, comment on and
try to change the policies of the government of the day.
Although the Lennon and McCartney
song was a piece of musical fiction it reflected Cathy’s story and also the
concerns of society/parents at the time. In the song the unnamed girl slips
downstairs at 5 o’clock in the morning, leaving a note for her parents who then
form a sort of Greek chorus of British public opinion:
“She
(We gave her most of our lives)
is
leaving (Sacrificed most of our lives)
Home (We
gave her everything money could buy)”
(Lennon, McCartney, 1967).
Paul McCartney has said since that
the song was inspired by a front-page story from the Daily Mirror, about a 17-year-old girl who had run away from home
(Miles, 1997). In the same way, ‘Cathy Come Home’ looked at social issues that
were known about – homelessness, unemployment, and single mothers – but not
widely discussed in the popular media, at that time. It was a new genre, a
docudrama that gave “a voice to the
working class experience and touch(ed) the social conscience of their audience”
(Biressi, Nunn, 2005).
Nearly fifty years later, ‘Benefits
Street’ is a British series that first showed in January 2014. While it is
described as a documentary, there are elements of reality television in its
controversial story lines. ‘Benefits Street’, season two, has just finished its
run in New Zealand. It was a good example of what Hill calls hybrid programming
where “particular elements of reality
programming…draw on the staple ingredients of tabloid journalism” (Hill,
2005) and where television producers, directors and writers give the point of
view of a working class (or in this case the non-working class) community. The
idea is to reach out to and influence the thinking and social conscience of the
audience, just as ‘Cathy Come Home’ did in 1966. ‘Benefits Street’ might be promoted
as a documentary but careful editing has made it more like reality television.
As a film crew trails them, the residents of James Turner Street in Birmingham
are shown committing crimes, cheating on their welfare payments and openly
using drugs. This is reality television: the director has clearly given
directives or suggestions to individuals that the audience would like to see,
for example, how to get away with shop lifting. The subjects of the documentary
following a pre-determined storyline are encouraged to act outside the law in
order to entertain, to enrage and boost ratings (Price, 2014).
‘Cathy Come Home’ contributed to the
development of Reality TV because it blurred “the boundaries between performance dramatization and documentary form”
(Biressi, Nunn, 2005). Like ‘Benefits Street’, it showed ordinary people as
“complex characters negotiating a complex
world” and it was “poetic realism or
observational documentary” (Biressi, Nunn, 2005). The naturalistic style of
‘Cathy Come Home’ was innovative at the time and helped to create the play’s
impact. Many scenes were improvised. According to the BBC’s Witness programme,
the final scene, where Cathy’s children are taken from her at a railway
station, was filmed to include members of the public who were simply there at
the time. As the camera rolled, Cathy is seen to be enormously distressed just
as might happen in real life, but no one intervenes, no one steps in to help
(BBC World Service, 2011). Some of the residents of ‘Benefits Street’ (James
Turner Street) have claimed they were tricked into appearing in the documentary
(Suart, 2014), and tricked into portraying some events as if they really
happened that way. There is a view that careful editing intended to provoke a
response from the viewing audience (Price, 2014), and that’s what makes
‘Benefit Street’ Reality TV: “non-professional
actors, unscripted dialogue, surveillance footage, hand-held cameras, seeing events
unfold as they are happening in front of the camera” (Hill, 2005). It was a
style pioneered by ‘Cathy Come Home’, and was supported by the social issues of
the day reflected in The Beatles’ song “She’s Leaving Home”.
“She
(We never thought of ourselves)
Is
leaving (Never a thought for ourselves)
Home (We
struggled hard all our lives to get by)”
(Lennon, McCartney, 1967).
References:
·
BBC
World Service: Witness: Cathy Come Home,
16 November 2011.
·
Biressi,
A. & Nunn, N. (2005). Real Lives, documentary approaches. In Reality TV:
realism and revelation. (pp. 35-58) London: Wallflower.
·
Hill,
A. (2005) The reality genre. In A. Hill, Reality
TV: Audiences and Popular Factual Television. (pp. 14-40). Oxon: Routledge.
·
Hill,
A. (2005) The rise of reality TV. In A. Hill, Reality TV: Audiences and Popular Factual Television. (pp. 15-40).
Oxon: Routledge.
·
McCartney, P.,
& Lennon, J. (1967). The Beatles Lyrics: She's Leaving Home. Retrieved
from http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/beatles/shesleavinghome.html
·
Miles,
Barry (1997). Paul McCartney: Many Years
From Now. New York: Henry Holt & Company. ISBN 0-8050-5249-6.
·
Price,
Garreth (22 February 2014). “Decoding Benefits Street: how Britain was divided
by a television show”. The Guardian
(Guardian Media Group). Retrieved 22 February 2014).
· ·
Sandford, J.
(1966). Cathy Come Home [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=cathy+come+home
·
Suart,
Paul (6 January 2014). “Benefits Street TV show lied to us, say Winson Green
residents”. Birmingham Mail (Trinity
Mirror). Retrieved 23 January 2014.
Max I want to thank you for this post, I have learned a lot about reality television from it.
ReplyDeleteI think your point of the "working class (or in this case the non-working class) community" opens a rather ugly can of worms about social justice, equality & equity and the equal right to the pursuit of happiness. My personal repulsion to the manipulative type reality TV such as Big Brother, Survivor, Benefits Street roots in the impression, that the producers are very much following the Roman "Panem et Circenses" motto [Bread and Circus performances to pacify the proletariat], the subjects of the program are treated like cannon fodder, nothing matters except show ratings and therefor the these programs are a rather distasteful outgrowth of consumer society.
I found your post very well written, it would hold its ground in the public domain too in my opinion.
Another amazing post. Balazs is right, this is a sharp and well researched mini-article. I always liked the idea of Biressi's poetic-realism - and it is so appropriate here.
ReplyDeletePS - thanks for the Beatles (lol you inspired me to change my Pandora station).